Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WBGSX
RGACX vs WBGSX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WBGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.34
Change+$0.23 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
William Blair Growth N
Price$6.78
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets231.76M
RGACX vs WBGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WBGSX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and WBGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. WBGSX (232M). RGACX pays higher dividends than WBGSX: RGACX (0.07) vs WBGSX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than WBGSX: RGACX (24 years) vs WBGSX (80 years). WBGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). WBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBGSX: RGACX (250) vs WBGSX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.45 vs. WBGSX (-25.08). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 20.43 vs. WBGSX (-38.92).
| RGACX | WBGSX | RGACX / WBGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.20 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.23 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 80 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.821 | -22.867 | -39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 232M | 146,121% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.45 | -25.08 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.36 | -14.50 | -437% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.43 | -38.92 | -52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.34 | -45.98 | -201% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement