Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WBGSX
RGACX vs WBGSX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WBGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$75.52
Change-$0.91 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
William Blair Growth N
Price$8.62
Change-$0.14 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.84M
RGACX vs WBGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WBGSX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and WBGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. WBGSX (225M). RGACX pays higher dividends than WBGSX: RGACX (0.08) vs WBGSX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than WBGSX: RGACX (23 years) vs WBGSX (79 years). WBGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). WBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBGSX: RGACX (250) vs WBGSX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.70 vs. WBGSX (-20.55). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 46.78 vs. WBGSX (-12.13).
| RGACX | WBGSX | RGACX / WBGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.20 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.23 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 79 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.903 | -1.934 | -254% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 225M | 136,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.70 | -20.55 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.90 | 3.23 | 1,605% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.78 | -12.13 | -386% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.68 | -39.08 | -178% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement