Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WBGSX
RGACX vs WBGSX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WBGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$81.42
Change+$0.27 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
RGACX vs WBGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WBGSX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and WBGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. WBGSX (243M). RGACX pays higher dividends than WBGSX: RGACX (0.07) vs WBGSX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than WBGSX: RGACX (23 years) vs WBGSX (79 years). WBGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). WBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBGSX: RGACX (250) vs WBGSX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.14 vs. WBGSX (-12.63). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 46.50 vs. WBGSX (-11.23).
| RGACX | WBGSX | RGACX / WBGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.20 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.23 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 79 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.099 | 7.053 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 243M | 134,979% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.14 | -12.63 | -136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.85 | 7.30 | 779% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.50 | -11.23 | -414% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.94 | -33.87 | -245% |