Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WBGSX
RGACX vs WBGSX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WBGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.93
Change-$0.02 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.52B
William Blair Growth N
Price$9.94
Change+$0.03 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets246.43M
RGACX vs WBGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WBGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and WBGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. WBGSX (246M). RGACX pays higher dividends than WBGSX: RGACX (0.07) vs WBGSX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than WBGSX: RGACX (24 years) vs WBGSX (80 years). WBGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). WBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBGSX: RGACX (250) vs WBGSX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. WBGSX (-17.37). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.90 vs. WBGSX (-16.33).
| RGACX | WBGSX | RGACX / WBGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.20 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.23 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 80 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.364 | 13.083 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 246M | 138,618% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.31 | -17.37 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.31 | 15.18 | 417% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.90 | -16.33 | -232% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.36 | -28.39 | -346% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement