Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WBGSX
RGACX vs WBGSX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WBGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$86.23
Change+$0.52 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
William Blair Growth N
Price$9.84
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets242.59M
RGACX vs WBGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WBGSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a StrongBuy and WBGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. WBGSX (243M). RGACX pays higher dividends than WBGSX: RGACX (0.07) vs WBGSX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than WBGSX: RGACX (24 years) vs WBGSX (80 years). WBGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). WBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBGSX: RGACX (250) vs WBGSX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.46 vs. WBGSX (-19.38). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 29.83 vs. WBGSX (-19.57).
| RGACX | WBGSX | RGACX / WBGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.20 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.23 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 80 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.558 | 11.718 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 243M | 139,506% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.46 | -19.38 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.09 | 11.09 | 542% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.83 | -19.57 | -152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.90 | -32.04 | -281% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement