Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WBGSX
RGACX vs WBGSX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WBGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
William Blair Growth N
Price$9.89
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets249.75M
RGACX vs WBGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WBGSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and WBGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. WBGSX (250M). RGACX pays higher dividends than WBGSX: RGACX (0.07) vs WBGSX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than WBGSX: RGACX (23 years) vs WBGSX (80 years). WBGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). WBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBGSX: RGACX (250) vs WBGSX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.01 vs. WBGSX (-14.81). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. WBGSX (-15.61).
| RGACX | WBGSX | RGACX / WBGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.20 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.23 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 80 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.655 | 12.514 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 250M | 134,400% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.01 | -14.81 | -74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.57 | 20.76 | 340% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.85 | -15.61 | -242% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.78 | -29.15 | -332% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement