Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs USLCX
RGACX vs USLCX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs USLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth C
Price$44.54
Change+$0.34 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2B
RGACX vs USLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. USLCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and USLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. USLCX (2B). RGACX pays higher dividends than USLCX: RGACX (0.07) vs USLCX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than USLCX: RGACX (23 years) vs USLCX (23 years). USLCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). USLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than USLCX: RGACX (250) vs USLCX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.01 vs. USLCX (-17.43). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. USLCX (-16.20).
| RGACX | USLCX | RGACX / USLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.88 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.89 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.655 | 1.412 | 1,251% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 2B | 16,858% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.01 | -17.43 | -63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.57 | 27.59 | 256% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.85 | -16.20 | -234% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.78 | 16.96 | 571% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement