Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs USLCX
RGACX vs USLCX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs USLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.05
Change-$1.88 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth C
Price$43.73
Change-$0.57 (-1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.8B
RGACX vs USLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. USLCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and USLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. USLCX (1.8B). RGACX pays higher dividends than USLCX: RGACX (0.07) vs USLCX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than USLCX: RGACX (24 years) vs USLCX (24 years). USLCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). USLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than USLCX: RGACX (250) vs USLCX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. USLCX (-20.95). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.90 vs. USLCX (-18.16).
| RGACX | USLCX | RGACX / USLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.88 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.89 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.364 | 0.865 | 2,238% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 1.8B | 18,878% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.31 | -20.95 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.31 | 17.79 | 356% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.90 | -18.16 | -209% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.36 | 16.46 | 598% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement