Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs USLCX
RGACX vs USLCX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs USLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.34
Change+$0.23 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth C
Price$30.55
Change+$0.07 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.49B
RGACX vs USLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. USLCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and USLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. USLCX (1.49B). RGACX pays higher dividends than USLCX: RGACX (0.07) vs USLCX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than USLCX: RGACX (24 years) vs USLCX (24 years). USLCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. USLCX (29.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than USLCX: RGACX (250) vs USLCX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.45 vs. USLCX (-32.05). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 20.43 vs. USLCX (-36.57).
| RGACX | USLCX | RGACX / USLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.88 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.89 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.821 | -30.442 | -29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 1.49B | 22,721% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.45 | -32.05 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.36 | -14.57 | -435% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.43 | -36.57 | -56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.34 | -15.04 | -614% |