Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs USGLX
RGACX vs USGLX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs USGLX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$81.42
Change+$0.27 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth A
Price$66.94
Change+$0.33 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
RGACX vs USGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. USGLX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and USGLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. USGLX (2.11B). RGACX pays higher dividends than USGLX: RGACX (0.07) vs USGLX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than USGLX: RGACX (23 years) vs USGLX (30 years). USGLX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). USGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than USGLX: RGACX (250) vs USGLX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.14 vs. USGLX (-1.96). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 46.50 vs. USGLX (11.51).
| RGACX | USGLX | RGACX / USGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.13 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.14 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.099 | 5.103 | 257% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 2.11B | 15,523% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.14 | -1.96 | -873% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.85 | 33.21 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.50 | 11.51 | 404% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.94 | 55.49 | 149% |