Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs USGLX
RGACX vs USGLX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs USGLX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$75.52
Change-$0.91 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth A
Price$64.23
Change-$1.05 (-1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
RGACX vs USGLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. USGLX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and USGLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. USGLX (2.05B). RGACX pays higher dividends than USGLX: RGACX (0.08) vs USGLX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than USGLX: RGACX (23 years) vs USGLX (30 years). USGLX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). USGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than USGLX: RGACX (250) vs USGLX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.70 vs. USGLX (-4.32). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 46.78 vs. USGLX (15.58).
| RGACX | USGLX | RGACX / USGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.13 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.14 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.903 | 0.848 | 578% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 2.05B | 14,934% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.70 | -4.32 | -155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.90 | 37.60 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.78 | 15.58 | 300% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.68 | 53.15 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement