Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TWMTX
RGACX vs TWMTX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TWMTX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.62
Change+$0.46 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Transamerica US Growth T
Price$139.26
Change+$1.31 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.84B
RGACX vs TWMTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TWMTX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and TWMTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. TWMTX (2.84B). RGACX pays higher dividends than TWMTX: RGACX (0.07) vs TWMTX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than TWMTX: RGACX (23 years) vs TWMTX (14 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than TWMTX (0.71). TWMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TWMTX: RGACX (250) vs TWMTX (1000). TWMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.05 vs. RGACX (21.05). TWMTX return over 5 years is better than : 68.96 vs. RGACX (42.51).
| RGACX | TWMTX | RGACX / TWMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.71 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.71 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.155 | 12.725 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | 9% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 2.84B | 11,674% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.05 | 24.05 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.55 | 71.65 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.51 | 68.96 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.10 | 245.07 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement