Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TWCCX
RGACX vs TWCCX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TWCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$76.64
Change-$9.33 (-10.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
American Century Ultra® C
Price$57.45
Change-$12.57 (-17.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.37B
RGACX vs TWCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TWCCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and TWCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. TWCCX (26.4B). RGACX (0.00) and TWCCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than TWCCX: RGACX (24 years) vs TWCCX (24 years). TWCCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TWCCX (15.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TWCCX: RGACX (250) vs TWCCX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.06 vs. TWCCX (-8.66). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 11.01 vs. TWCCX (-4.60).
| RGACX | TWCCX | RGACX / TWCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.87 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.92 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.046 | -2.229 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 26.4B | 1,273% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.06 | -8.66 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.58 | 28.99 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.01 | -4.60 | -239% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.97 | 117.45 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement