Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TSNCX
RGACX vs TSNCX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TSNCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth C
Price$18.52
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.46B
RGACX vs TSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TSNCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and TSNCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. TSNCX (2.47B). RGACX pays higher dividends than TSNCX: RGACX (0.07) vs TSNCX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than TSNCX: RGACX (23 years) vs TSNCX (15 years). TSNCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). TSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSNCX: RGACX (250) vs TSNCX (2500). TSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.33 vs. RGACX (11.01). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. TSNCX (-3.89).
| RGACX | TSNCX | RGACX / TSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.77 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.02 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.655 | 18.870 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 2.47B | 13,631% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.01 | 26.33 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.57 | 118.91 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.85 | -3.89 | -974% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.78 | -11.87 | -815% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement