Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TGWFX
RGACX vs TGWFX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TGWFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
Transamerica Large Growth R4
Price$15.28
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets380.18M
RGACX vs TGWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TGWFX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and TGWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. TGWFX (380M). RGACX pays higher dividends than TGWFX: RGACX (0.07) vs TGWFX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than TGWFX: RGACX (23 years) vs TGWFX (25 years). TGWFX (0.96) and RGACX (0.94) have similar cost to investors . TGWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGWFX: RGACX (250) vs TGWFX (5000). TGWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.82 vs. RGACX (14.08). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. TGWFX (-7.23).
| RGACX | TGWFX | RGACX / TGWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.90 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.96 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.044 | 16.109 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 380M | 86,579% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.08 | 18.82 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.19 | 42.14 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.95 | -7.23 | -581% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.68 | 66.29 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers