Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TGCNX
RGACX vs TGCNX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TGCNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
TCW Concentrated Large Cap Growth N Cl
Price$25.53
Change-$0.05 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets745.37M
RGACX vs TGCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TGCNX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and TGCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. TGCNX (745M). RGACX pays higher dividends than TGCNX: RGACX (0.07) vs TGCNX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than TGCNX: RGACX (23 years) vs TGCNX (26 years). TGCNX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. TGCNX (12.77). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGCNX: RGACX (250) vs TGCNX (2000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. TGCNX (-0.55). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. TGCNX (-13.95).
| RGACX | TGCNX | RGACX / TGCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.93 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.06 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.044 | 10.233 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 745M | 44,161% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.08 | -0.55 | -2,582% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.19 | -1.96 | -2,103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.95 | -13.95 | -301% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.68 | -8.33 | -1,005% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement