Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TGCNX
RGACX vs TGCNX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TGCNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.78
Change+$1.08 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
TCW Concentrated Large Cap Growth N Cl
Price$26.19
Change+$0.25 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets744.32M
RGACX vs TGCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TGCNX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and TGCNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. TGCNX (744M). RGACX pays higher dividends than TGCNX: RGACX (0.07) vs TGCNX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than TGCNX: RGACX (23 years) vs TGCNX (27 years). TGCNX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. TGCNX (12.77). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGCNX: RGACX (250) vs TGCNX (2000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.01 vs. TGCNX (-3.78). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. TGCNX (-18.43).
| RGACX | TGCNX | RGACX / TGCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.93 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.06 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.655 | 12.003 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 744M | 45,296% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.01 | -3.78 | -291% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.57 | 23.70 | 298% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.85 | -18.43 | -205% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.78 | -3.03 | -3,196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement