Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TGCNX
RGACX vs TGCNX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TGCNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
TCW Concentrated Large Cap Growth N Cl
Price$25.55
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets741.78M
RGACX vs TGCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TGCNX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and TGCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. TGCNX (742M). RGACX pays higher dividends than TGCNX: RGACX (0.07) vs TGCNX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than TGCNX: RGACX (23 years) vs TGCNX (27 years). TGCNX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. TGCNX (12.77). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGCNX: RGACX (250) vs TGCNX (2000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. TGCNX (2.12). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. TGCNX (-16.61).
| RGACX | TGCNX | RGACX / TGCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.93 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.06 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.516 | 10.320 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 742M | 44,744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.83 | 2.12 | 842% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.53 | 11.18 | 523% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | -16.61 | -241% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.93 | -3.22 | -2,979% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement