Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TGCEX
RGACX vs TGCEX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TGCEX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.78
Change+$1.08 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
TCW Concentrated Large Cap Growth I Cl
Price$34.42
Change+$0.33 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets744.32M
RGACX vs TGCEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TGCEX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and TGCEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. TGCEX (744M). RGACX pays higher dividends than TGCEX: RGACX (0.07) vs TGCEX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than TGCEX: RGACX (23 years) vs TGCEX (33 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than TGCEX (0.78). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. TGCEX (12.77). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGCEX: RGACX (250) vs TGCEX (2000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.01 vs. TGCEX (0.32). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. TGCEX (-5.91).
| RGACX | TGCEX | RGACX / TGCEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.78 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.78 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.655 | 12.101 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 744M | 45,296% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.01 | 0.32 | 3,400% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.57 | 37.96 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.85 | -5.91 | -641% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.78 | 19.95 | 485% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement