Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TCPWX
RGACX vs TCPWX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TCPWX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.62
Change+$0.46 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Transamerica Capital Growth R6
Price$14.51
Change+$0.29 (+2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.67B
RGACX vs TCPWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TCPWX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and TCPWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. TCPWX (1.67B). RGACX pays higher dividends than TCPWX: RGACX (0.07) vs TCPWX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than TCPWX: RGACX (23 years) vs TCPWX (6 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than TCPWX (0.74). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. TCPWX (20.00). TCPWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: TCPWX (0) vs RGACX (250). TCPWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 74.12 vs. RGACX (17.83). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. TCPWX (-28.36).
| RGACX | TCPWX | RGACX / TCPWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.74 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.74 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.516 | 27.208 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 1.67B | 19,845% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.83 | 74.12 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.53 | 129.30 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | -28.36 | -141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement