Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TBDCX
RGACX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TBDCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$75.52
Change-$0.91 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth C
Price$12.01
Change-$0.17 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets373.34M
RGACX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TBDCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and TBDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. TBDCX (373M). RGACX pays higher dividends than TBDCX: RGACX (0.08) vs TBDCX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: RGACX (23 years) vs TBDCX (26 years). TBDCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: RGACX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.70 vs. TBDCX (-8.11). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 46.78 vs. TBDCX (2.04).
| RGACX | TBDCX | RGACX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.90 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.96 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.903 | 2.300 | 213% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 373M | 82,038% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.70 | -8.11 | -83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.90 | 56.99 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.78 | 2.04 | 2,294% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.68 | 16.26 | 428% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement