Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs STFFX
RGACX vs STFFX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs STFFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.65
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Allspring Large Cap Growth R6
Price$44.52
Change-$0.63 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets963.26M
RGACX vs STFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. STFFX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and STFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. STFFX (963M). RGACX (0.00) and STFFX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than STFFX: RGACX (24 years) vs STFFX (13 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than STFFX (0.75). STFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). STFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: STFFX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.96 vs. STFFX (0.13). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 18.14 vs. STFFX (-11.40).
| RGACX | STFFX | RGACX / STFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.60 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.75 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.549 | -1.176 | -132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 963M | 34,891% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.96 | 0.13 | 6,642% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.48 | 30.40 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.14 | -11.40 | -159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.80 | 6.68 | 1,735% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement