Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs STCZX
RGACX vs STCZX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs STCZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
Virtus Silvant Large-Cap Growth Stk R6
Price$17.64
Change-$0.04 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets249.41M
RGACX vs STCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. STCZX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and STCZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. STCZX (249M). RGACX pays higher dividends than STCZX: RGACX (0.07) vs STCZX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than STCZX: RGACX (23 years) vs STCZX (11 years). RGACX (0.94) and STCZX (0.92) have similar cost to investors . RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. STCZX (12.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than STCZX: RGACX (250) vs STCZX (2500000). STCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. RGACX (14.08). STCZX return over 5 years is better than : 81.67 vs. RGACX (41.95).
| RGACX | STCZX | RGACX / STCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.72 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.92 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.044 | 12.000 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 249M | 132,129% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.08 | 20.57 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.19 | 77.46 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.95 | 81.67 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.68 | 63.18 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers