Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs STCZX
RGACX vs STCZX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs STCZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Virtus Silvant Large-Cap Growth Stk R6
Price$17.77
Change+$0.19 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.42M
RGACX vs STCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. STCZX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and STCZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. STCZX (248M). RGACX pays higher dividends than STCZX: RGACX (0.07) vs STCZX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than STCZX: RGACX (23 years) vs STCZX (11 years). RGACX (0.94) and STCZX (0.92) have similar cost to investors . RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. STCZX (12.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than STCZX: RGACX (250) vs STCZX (2500000). STCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.88 vs. RGACX (17.83). STCZX return over 5 years is better than : 77.35 vs. RGACX (40.02).
| RGACX | STCZX | RGACX / STCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.72 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.92 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.516 | 12.825 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 248M | 133,871% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.83 | 24.88 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.53 | 102.16 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | 77.35 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.93 | 73.87 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers