Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs SSTFX
RGACX vs SSTFX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs SSTFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
Virtus KAR Capital Growth C
Price$11.33
Change-$0.05 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets689.01M
RGACX vs SSTFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. SSTFX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and SSTFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. SSTFX (689M). RGACX pays higher dividends than SSTFX: RGACX (0.07) vs SSTFX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than SSTFX: RGACX (23 years) vs SSTFX (28 years). SSTFX (2.02) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. SSTFX (14.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSTFX: RGACX (250) vs SSTFX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. SSTFX (-9.36). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. SSTFX (-35.26).
| RGACX | SSTFX | RGACX / SSTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.02 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.02 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.516 | 6.786 | 229% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 689M | 48,186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.83 | -9.36 | -191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.53 | -11.21 | -522% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | -35.26 | -114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.93 | 0.53 | 18,018% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement