Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs SSGFX
RGACX vs SSGFX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs SSGFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
RGACX vs SSGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. SSGFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and SSGFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. SSGFX (86.3M). RGACX pays higher dividends than SSGFX: RGACX (0.07) vs SSGFX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than SSGFX: RGACX (23 years) vs SSGFX (39 years). SSGFX (0.96) and RGACX (0.94) have similar cost to investors . RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. SSGFX (6.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGFX: RGACX (250) vs SSGFX (1000). SSGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.06 vs. RGACX (11.01). SSGFX return over 5 years is better than : 56.24 vs. RGACX (37.85).
| RGACX | SSGFX | RGACX / SSGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.96 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.96 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.655 | 16.913 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 86.3M | 389,340% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.01 | 17.06 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.57 | 80.57 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.85 | 56.24 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.78 | 156.41 | 62% |