Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs SSGFX
RGACX vs SSGFX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs SSGFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.62
Change+$0.46 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
RGACX vs SSGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. SSGFX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and SSGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. SSGFX (83.6M). RGACX pays higher dividends than SSGFX: RGACX (0.07) vs SSGFX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than SSGFX: RGACX (23 years) vs SSGFX (38 years). SSGFX (0.96) and RGACX (0.94) have similar cost to investors . RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. SSGFX (6.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGFX: RGACX (250) vs SSGFX (1000). SSGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.08 vs. RGACX (17.83). SSGFX return over 5 years is better than : 56.31 vs. RGACX (40.02).
| RGACX | SSGFX | RGACX / SSGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.96 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.96 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.516 | 13.303 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 83.6M | 397,129% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.83 | 21.08 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.53 | 66.90 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | 56.31 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.93 | 152.55 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement