Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs SMMSX
RGACX vs SMMSX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs SMMSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
RGACX vs SMMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. SMMSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and SMMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. SMMSX (3.68B). RGACX pays higher dividends than SMMSX: RGACX (0.07) vs SMMSX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than SMMSX: RGACX (23 years) vs SMMSX (16 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than SMMSX (0.88). SMMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). SMMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: SMMSX (0) vs RGACX (250). SMMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.74 vs. RGACX (17.83). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. SMMSX (17.22).
| RGACX | SMMSX | RGACX / SMMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.88 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.88 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.516 | 9.382 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 3.68B | 9,019% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.83 | 23.74 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.53 | 66.29 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | 17.22 | 232% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.93 | 90.63 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement