Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs SLGCX
RGACX vs SLGCX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs SLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$81.42
Change+$0.27 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth C
Price$5.81
Change+$0.04 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.37M
RGACX vs SLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. SLGCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and SLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. SLGCX (39.4M). RGACX pays higher dividends than SLGCX: RGACX (0.07) vs SLGCX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than SLGCX: RGACX (23 years) vs SLGCX (27 years). SLGCX (2.67) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). SLGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX (250) and SLGCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.14 vs. SLGCX (-41.73). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 46.50 vs. SLGCX (-61.47).
| RGACX | SLGCX | RGACX / SLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.67 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.67 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.099 | 12.816 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 39.4M | 832,487% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.14 | -41.73 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.85 | -39.42 | -144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.50 | -61.47 | -76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.94 | -75.36 | -110% |