Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs SGZFX
RGACX vs SGZFX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs SGZFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
RGACX vs SGZFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. SGZFX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and SGZFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. SGZFX (83.3M). RGACX pays higher dividends than SGZFX: RGACX (0.07) vs SGZFX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than SGZFX: RGACX (23 years) vs SGZFX (8 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than SGZFX (0.72). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. SGZFX (6.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGZFX: RGACX (250) vs SGZFX (1000). SGZFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.00 vs. RGACX (14.08). SGZFX return over 5 years is better than : 62.26 vs. RGACX (41.95).
| RGACX | SGZFX | RGACX / SGZFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.72 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.72 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.044 | 12.687 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 83.3M | 394,958% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.08 | 19.00 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.19 | 50.11 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.95 | 62.26 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement