Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs SGFFX
RGACX vs SGFFX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs SGFFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
RGACX vs SGFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. SGFFX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and SGFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. SGFFX (73.9M). RGACX pays higher dividends than SGFFX: RGACX (0.07) vs SGFFX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than SGFFX: RGACX (23 years) vs SGFFX (27 years). SGFFX (1.85) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. SGFFX (20.81). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGFFX: RGACX (250) vs SGFFX (1000). SGFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.65 vs. RGACX (14.08). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. SGFFX (38.41).
| RGACX | SGFFX | RGACX / SGFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.85 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.85 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.044 | 10.938 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 73.9M | 445,196% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.08 | 24.65 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.19 | 40.02 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.95 | 38.41 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.68 | 151.35 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement