Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs WPSZX
RGABX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs WPSZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$77.58
Change+$0.30 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.66B
AB Concentrated Growth Z
Price$56.69
Change+$0.27 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets721.52M
RGABX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. WPSZX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Hold and WPSZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. WPSZX (722M). WPSZX pays higher dividends than RGABX: WPSZX (0.15) vs RGABX (0.00). RGABX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: RGABX (23 years) vs WPSZX (12 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than WPSZX (0.72). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSZX (11.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: RGABX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.97 vs. WPSZX (-5.85). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 39.53 vs. WPSZX (25.17).
| RGABX | WPSZX | RGABX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.72 | 193% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.72 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.802 | 6.882 | 244% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 722M | 46,537% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.15 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.97 | -5.85 | -188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.66 | 34.79 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.53 | 25.17 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.86 | 115.85 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement