Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs WPSZX
RGABX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs WPSZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$75.54
Change-$0.05 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
AB Concentrated Growth Z
Price$56.85
Change-$0.14 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets735.29M
RGABX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. WPSZX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Buy and WPSZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. WPSZX (735M). WPSZX pays higher dividends than RGABX: WPSZX (0.15) vs RGABX (0.00). RGABX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: RGABX (23 years) vs WPSZX (11 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than WPSZX (0.72). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSZX (11.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: RGABX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.81 vs. WPSZX (-0.91). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 36.01 vs. WPSZX (24.16).
| RGABX | WPSZX | RGABX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.72 | 193% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.72 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.731 | 7.183 | 191% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 735M | 44,762% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.15 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.81 | -0.91 | -1,404% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.40 | 12.53 | 298% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.01 | 24.16 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.15 | 93.47 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement