Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs WLGRX
RGABX vs WLGRX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs WLGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$71.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Nomura Large Cap Growth R
Price$33.45
Change+$0.09 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.83B
RGABX vs WLGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. WLGRX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Hold and WLGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. WLGRX (7.83B). RGABX (0.00) and WLGRX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than WLGRX: RGABX (24 years) vs WLGRX (20 years). RGABX (1.38) is less costly to investors than WLGRX (1.22). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WLGRX (18.00). WLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: WLGRX (0) vs RGABX (250). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.11 vs. WLGRX (-1.96). WLGRX return over 5 years is better than : 24.26 vs. RGABX (14.46).
| RGABX | WLGRX | RGABX / WLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 1.14 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 1.22 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.272 | 0.481 | 1,513% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 7.83B | 4,331% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.11 | -1.96 | -209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.97 | 63.17 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.46 | 24.26 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.62 | 84.60 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement