Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs WLGRX
RGABX vs WLGRX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs WLGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$69.68
Change-$9.36 (-11.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Nomura Large Cap Growth R
Price$31.08
Change-$5.14 (-14.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.96B
RGABX vs WLGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. WLGRX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Hold and WLGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. WLGRX (6.96B). RGABX (0.00) and WLGRX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than WLGRX: RGABX (24 years) vs WLGRX (20 years). RGABX (1.38) is less costly to investors than WLGRX (1.22). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WLGRX (18.00). WLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: WLGRX (0) vs RGABX (250). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.62 vs. WLGRX (-7.11). WLGRX return over 5 years is better than : 12.16 vs. RGABX (5.53).
| RGABX | WLGRX | RGABX / WLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 1.14 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 1.22 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.079 | -6.018 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 6.96B | 4,828% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.62 | -7.11 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.71 | 36.86 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.53 | 12.16 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.35 | 98.09 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement