Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs WLGAX
RGABX vs WLGAX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs WLGAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$75.54
Change-$0.05 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund A
Price$39.05
Change+$0.02 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.17B
RGABX vs WLGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. WLGAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Buy and WLGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. WLGAX (8.17B). RGABX (0.00) and WLGAX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than WLGAX: RGABX (23 years) vs WLGAX (25 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than WLGAX (0.99). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGAX (18.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGAX: RGABX (250) vs WLGAX (1000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.81 vs. WLGAX (12.02). WLGAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.77 vs. RGABX (36.01).
| RGABX | WLGAX | RGABX / WLGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.89 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.99 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.731 | 7.457 | 184% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 8.17B | 4,026% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.81 | 12.02 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.40 | 32.78 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.01 | 38.77 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.15 | 98.02 | 74% |