Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs WGFCX
RGABX vs WGFCX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs WGFCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$76.49
Change+$0.17 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
RGABX vs WGFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. WGFCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Buy and WGFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. WGFCX (3.57B). RGABX (0.00) and WGFCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than WGFCX: RGABX (23 years) vs WGFCX (23 years). WGFCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). WGFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than WGFCX: RGABX (250) vs WGFCX (1000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.53 vs. WGFCX (-48.93). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 34.12 vs. WGFCX (-74.95).
| RGABX | WGFCX | RGABX / WGFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.90 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.93 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.161 | 14.791 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 3.57B | 9,313% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.53 | -48.93 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.24 | -48.71 | -111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.12 | -74.95 | -46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.61 | -82.75 | -101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement