Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs USLCX
RGABX vs USLCX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs USLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$77.87
Change+$0.16 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth C
Price$44.54
Change+$0.34 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2B
RGABX vs USLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. USLCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Hold and USLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. USLCX (2B). RGABX (0.00) and USLCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than USLCX: RGABX (23 years) vs USLCX (23 years). USLCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). USLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than USLCX: RGABX (250) vs USLCX (1000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.77 vs. USLCX (-17.43). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 32.07 vs. USLCX (-16.20).
| RGABX | USLCX | RGABX / USLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.88 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.89 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.239 | 1.412 | 1,221% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 2B | 16,858% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.77 | -17.43 | -56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.96 | 27.59 | 239% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.07 | -16.20 | -198% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.44 | 16.96 | 498% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement