Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs USLCX
RGABX vs USLCX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs USLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$73.55
Change+$0.72 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth C
Price$46.00
Change+$0.50 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.13B
RGABX vs USLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. USLCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Buy and USLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. USLCX (2.13B). RGABX (0.00) and USLCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than USLCX: RGABX (23 years) vs USLCX (23 years). USLCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). USLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than USLCX: RGABX (250) vs USLCX (1000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.04 vs. USLCX (-9.43). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 40.87 vs. USLCX (-2.11).
| RGABX | USLCX | RGABX / USLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.88 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.89 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.735 | 4.736 | 227% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 2.13B | 15,186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.04 | -9.43 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.81 | 25.99 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.87 | -2.11 | -1,940% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.21 | 25.85 | 275% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement