Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs USLCX
RGABX vs USLCX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs USLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$76.91
Change+$0.42 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth C
Price$45.02
Change+$0.19 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
RGABX vs USLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. USLCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Buy and USLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. USLCX (2.04B). RGABX (0.00) and USLCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than USLCX: RGABX (23 years) vs USLCX (23 years). USLCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). USLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than USLCX: RGABX (250) vs USLCX (1000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.69 vs. USLCX (-12.14). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 36.51 vs. USLCX (-11.34).
| RGABX | USLCX | RGABX / USLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.88 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.89 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.793 | 2.505 | 631% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 2.04B | 16,282% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.69 | -12.14 | -162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.45 | 15.64 | 303% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.51 | -11.34 | -322% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.70 | 23.72 | 357% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement