Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs USLCX
RGABX vs USLCX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs USLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$75.54
Change-$0.05 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth C
Price$45.38
Change+$0.24 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
RGABX vs USLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. USLCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Buy and USLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. USLCX (2.07B). RGABX (0.00) and USLCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than USLCX: RGABX (23 years) vs USLCX (23 years). USLCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). USLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than USLCX: RGABX (250) vs USLCX (1000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.81 vs. USLCX (-12.93). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 36.01 vs. USLCX (-8.19).
| RGABX | USLCX | RGABX / USLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.88 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.89 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.731 | 3.324 | 413% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 2.07B | 15,901% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.81 | -12.93 | -99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.40 | 10.04 | 373% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.01 | -8.19 | -440% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.15 | 18.70 | 386% |