Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs USLCX
RGABX vs USLCX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs USLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$79.74
Change+$0.10 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth C
Price$44.93
Change+$0.38 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.78B
RGABX vs USLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. USLCX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a StrongBuy and USLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. USLCX (1.78B). RGABX (0.00) and USLCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than USLCX: RGABX (24 years) vs USLCX (24 years). USLCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). USLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than USLCX: RGABX (250) vs USLCX (1000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.39 vs. USLCX (-20.67). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 25.75 vs. USLCX (-17.00).
| RGABX | USLCX | RGABX / USLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.88 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.89 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.904 | 2.300 | 866% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 1.78B | 19,002% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.39 | -20.67 | -31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.07 | 20.36 | 315% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.75 | -17.00 | -152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.61 | 17.59 | 498% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement