Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs USLCX
RGABX vs USLCX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs USLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$69.68
Change-$9.36 (-11.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth C
Price$28.64
Change-$16.56 (-36.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
RGABX vs USLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. USLCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Hold and USLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. USLCX (1.39B). RGABX (0.00) and USLCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than USLCX: RGABX (24 years) vs USLCX (24 years). USLCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.38). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. USLCX (29.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than USLCX: RGABX (250) vs USLCX (1000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.62 vs. USLCX (-36.96). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 5.53 vs. USLCX (-42.32).
| RGABX | USLCX | RGABX / USLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 1.88 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 1.89 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.079 | -5.416 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 1.39B | 24,190% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.62 | -36.96 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.71 | -27.51 | -137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.53 | -42.32 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.35 | -9.51 | -1,034% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement