Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs USLCX
RGABX vs USLCX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs USLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$77.25
Change-$1.73 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth C
Price$43.73
Change-$0.57 (-1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.8B
RGABX vs USLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. USLCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Buy and USLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. USLCX (1.8B). RGABX (0.00) and USLCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than USLCX: RGABX (24 years) vs USLCX (24 years). USLCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). USLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than USLCX: RGABX (250) vs USLCX (1000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. USLCX (-20.95). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 29.25 vs. USLCX (-18.16).
| RGABX | USLCX | RGABX / USLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.88 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.89 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.305 | 0.865 | 1,885% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 1.8B | 18,878% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.96 | -20.95 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.27 | 17.79 | 322% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.25 | -18.16 | -161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.44 | 16.46 | 483% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement