Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs TCPWX
RGABX vs TCPWX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs TCPWX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$77.25
Change-$1.73 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Transamerica Capital Growth R6
Price$13.64
Change-$0.64 (-4.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.62B
RGABX vs TCPWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. TCPWX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Buy and TCPWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. TCPWX (1.62B). RGABX (0.00) and TCPWX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than TCPWX: RGABX (24 years) vs TCPWX (6 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than TCPWX (0.74). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. TCPWX (20.00). TCPWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: TCPWX (0) vs RGABX (250). TCPWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.65 vs. RGABX (7.12). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 32.14 vs. TCPWX (-34.82).
| RGABX | TCPWX | RGABX / TCPWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.74 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.74 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.910 | 26.148 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 1.62B | 20,975% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.12 | 30.65 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.91 | 130.32 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.14 | -34.82 | -92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.88 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement