Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs TCPWX
RGABX vs TCPWX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs TCPWX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$71.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Transamerica Capital Growth R6
Price$14.18
Change-$0.11 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
RGABX vs TCPWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. TCPWX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Hold and TCPWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. TCPWX (1.58B). RGABX (0.00) and TCPWX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than TCPWX: RGABX (24 years) vs TCPWX (6 years). RGABX (1.38) is less costly to investors than TCPWX (0.74). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TCPWX (20.00). TCPWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: TCPWX (0) vs RGABX (250). TCPWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.68 vs. RGABX (3.94). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 14.46 vs. TCPWX (-38.75).
| RGABX | TCPWX | RGABX / TCPWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 0.74 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 0.74 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.272 | 26.237 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 1.58B | 21,415% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.94 | 19.68 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.77 | 172.19 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.46 | -38.75 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement