Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs TCPWX
RGABX vs TCPWX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs TCPWX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$77.87
Change+$0.16 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
Transamerica Capital Growth R6
Price$14.65
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.67B
RGABX vs TCPWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. TCPWX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Hold and TCPWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. TCPWX (1.67B). RGABX (0.00) and TCPWX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than TCPWX: RGABX (23 years) vs TCPWX (6 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than TCPWX (0.74). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. TCPWX (20.00). TCPWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: TCPWX (0) vs RGABX (250). TCPWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.87 vs. RGABX (9.77). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 32.07 vs. TCPWX (-36.85).
| RGABX | TCPWX | RGABX / TCPWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.74 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.74 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.239 | 29.417 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 1.67B | 20,132% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.77 | 57.87 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.96 | 144.57 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.07 | -36.85 | -87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement