Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs STFFX
RGABX vs STFFX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs STFFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$75.54
Change-$0.05 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
Allspring Large Cap Growth R6
Price$51.43
Change-$0.06 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
RGABX vs STFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. STFFX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Buy and STFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. STFFX (1.04B). RGABX (0.00) and STFFX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than STFFX: RGABX (23 years) vs STFFX (13 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than STFFX (0.76). STFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). STFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: STFFX (0) vs RGABX (250). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.81 vs. STFFX (8.69). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 36.01 vs. STFFX (-2.41).
| RGABX | STFFX | RGABX / STFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.60 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.76 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.731 | 15.082 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 1.04B | 31,787% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.81 | 8.69 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.40 | 21.56 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.01 | -2.41 | -1,494% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.15 | 3.48 | 2,074% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement