Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs STFFX
RGABX vs STFFX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs STFFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$76.91
Change+$0.42 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Allspring Large Cap Growth R6
Price$51.80
Change+$0.36 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
RGABX vs STFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. STFFX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Buy and STFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. STFFX (1.03B). RGABX (0.00) and STFFX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than STFFX: RGABX (23 years) vs STFFX (13 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than STFFX (0.76). STFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). STFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: STFFX (0) vs RGABX (250). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.53 vs. STFFX (11.03). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 34.12 vs. STFFX (-5.74).
| RGABX | STFFX | RGABX / STFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.60 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.76 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.161 | 15.104 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 1.03B | 32,233% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.53 | 11.03 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.24 | 35.87 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.12 | -5.74 | -595% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.61 | 9.14 | 915% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement