Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs SLGCX
RGABX vs SLGCX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs SLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$78.51
Change-$1.23 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth C
Price$2.00
Change-$0.04 (-1.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.63M
RGABX vs SLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. SLGCX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a StrongBuy and SLGCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. SLGCX (41.6M). RGABX (0.00) and SLGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than SLGCX: RGABX (24 years) vs SLGCX (27 years). SLGCX (2.67) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.38). SLGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. RGABX (32.00). RGABX (250) and SLGCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.10 vs. SLGCX (-62.01). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 25.91 vs. SLGCX (-85.80).
| RGABX | SLGCX | RGABX / SLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 2.67 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 2.67 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.054 | -60.388 | -33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 41.6M | 814,904% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.10 | -62.01 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.64 | -74.81 | -84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.91 | -85.80 | -30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.27 | -91.42 | -95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement