Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs SLGCX
RGABX vs SLGCX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs SLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$78.86
Change+$0.99 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth C
Price$6.12
Change+$0.05 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.08M
RGABX vs SLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. SLGCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Hold and SLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. SLGCX (41.1M). RGABX (0.00) and SLGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than SLGCX: RGABX (23 years) vs SLGCX (27 years). SLGCX (2.67) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). SLGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX (250) and SLGCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.77 vs. SLGCX (-45.46). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 32.07 vs. SLGCX (-63.57).
| RGABX | SLGCX | RGABX / SLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 2.67 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 2.67 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.239 | 17.864 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 41.1M | 819,951% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.77 | -45.46 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.96 | -34.52 | -191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.07 | -63.57 | -50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.44 | -73.85 | -114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement