RFNDF
Price
$1.05
Change
+$0.04 (+3.96%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.54B
SOHO
Price
$0.89
Change
+$0.03 (+3.49%)
Updated
Jun 16, 04:29 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
28.78M
51 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

RFNDF vs SOHO

Header iconRFNDF vs SOHO Comparison
Open Charts RFNDF vs SOHOBanner chart's image
Rural Funds Group Stapled Securities
Price$1.05
Change+$0.04 (+3.96%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.54B
Sotherly Hotels
Price$0.89
Change+$0.03 (+3.49%)
Volume$100
Capitalization28.78M
RFNDF vs SOHO Comparison Chart
Loading...
SOHO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RFNDF vs. SOHO commentary
Jun 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFNDF is a Hold and SOHO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 17, 2025
Stock price -- (RFNDF: $1.05 vs. SOHO: $0.86)
Brand notoriety: RFNDF and SOHO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RFNDF: 40% vs. SOHO: 26%
Market capitalization -- RFNDF: $1.54B vs. SOHO: $28.78M
RFNDF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $1.54B. SOHO’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $28.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RFNDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSOHO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RFNDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SOHO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both RFNDF and SOHO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SOHO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SOHO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

RFNDF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SOHO (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +4.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

SOHO is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.26% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFNDF($1.54B) has a higher market cap than SOHO($28.8M). SOHO has higher P/E ratio than RFNDF: SOHO (17.75) vs RFNDF (3.29). RFNDF YTD gains are higher at: 5.000 vs. SOHO (-7.666). RFNDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 249M vs. SOHO (39.9M). SOHO has more cash in the bank: 17.1M vs. RFNDF (15.8M). SOHO has less debt than RFNDF: SOHO (318M) vs RFNDF (347M). SOHO has higher revenues than RFNDF: SOHO (174M) vs RFNDF (87.1M).
RFNDFSOHORFNDF / SOHO
Capitalization1.54B28.8M5,340%
EBITDA249M39.9M624%
Gain YTD5.000-7.666-65%
P/E Ratio3.2917.7519%
Revenue87.1M174M50%
Total Cash15.8M17.1M92%
Total Debt347M318M109%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RFNDF vs SOHO: Fundamental Ratings
RFNDF
SOHO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8692
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6257
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
182
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SOHO's Valuation (1) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RFNDF (37) in the null industry. This means that SOHO’s stock grew somewhat faster than RFNDF’s over the last 12 months.

SOHO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as RFNDF (100) in the null industry. This means that SOHO’s stock grew similarly to RFNDF’s over the last 12 months.

RFNDF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as SOHO (92) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that RFNDF’s stock grew similarly to SOHO’s over the last 12 months.

SOHO's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as RFNDF (62) in the null industry. This means that SOHO’s stock grew similarly to RFNDF’s over the last 12 months.

SOHO's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as RFNDF (18) in the null industry. This means that SOHO’s stock grew similarly to RFNDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SOHO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SOHO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LYG4.19-0.03
-0.71%
Lloyds Banking Group PLC
DUOT7.78-0.18
-2.26%
Duos Technologies Group
CAR121.91-3.30
-2.64%
Avis Budget Group
DBVT9.10-0.59
-6.09%
DBV Technologies S.A
FUBO3.17-0.24
-7.04%
fuboTV

RFNDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RFNDF and PAZRF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RFNDF and PAZRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RFNDF
1D Price
Change %
RFNDF100%
N/A
PAZRF - RFNDF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EFRTF - RFNDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
ARESF - RFNDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
SOHO - RFNDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.36%
BYLOF - RFNDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SOHO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOHO has been loosely correlated with DRETF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SOHO jumps, then DRETF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOHO
1D Price
Change %
SOHO100%
-2.36%
DRETF - SOHO
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CHMI - SOHO
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
ARR - SOHO
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
STWD - SOHO
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
BXMT - SOHO
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.90%
More