RFNDF
Price
$1.28
Change
+$0.03 (+2.40%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
492.75M
RSHPF
Price
$1.26
Change
+$0.09 (+7.69%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
603.79M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RFNDF vs RSHPF

Header iconRFNDF vs RSHPF Comparison
Open Charts RFNDF vs RSHPFBanner chart's image
Rural Funds Group Stapled Securities
Price$1.28
Change+$0.03 (+2.40%)
Volume$120
Capitalization492.75M
Irish Residential Properties REIT
Price$1.26
Change+$0.09 (+7.69%)
Volume$100
Capitalization603.79M
RFNDF vs RSHPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RFNDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RFNDF vs. RSHPF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFNDF is a Buy and RSHPF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (RFNDF: $1.28 vs. RSHPF: $1.26)
Brand notoriety: RFNDF and RSHPF are both not notable
RFNDF represents the Specialty Telecommunications, while RSHPF is part of the Media Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RFNDF: 6% vs. RSHPF: 1%
Market capitalization -- RFNDF: $492.75M vs. RSHPF: $603.79M
RFNDF [@Specialty Telecommunications] is valued at $492.75M. RSHPF’s [@Media Conglomerates] market capitalization is $603.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Telecommunications] industry ranges from $96.52B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Media Conglomerates] industry ranges from $27.14B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Telecommunications] industry is $15.11B. The average market capitalization across the [@Media Conglomerates] industry is $5.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RFNDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRSHPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RFNDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RSHPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RFNDF is a better buy in the long-term than RSHPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RFNDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSHPF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RFNDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RSHPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RSHPF is a better buy in the short-term than RFNDF.

Price Growth

RFNDF (@Specialty Telecommunications) experienced а +2.28% price change this week, while RSHPF (@Media Conglomerates) price change was +7.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.88%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.42%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Telecommunications (+0.31% weekly)

Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.

@Media Conglomerates (-0.15% weekly)

Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSHPF($604M) has a higher market cap than RFNDF($493M). RSHPF has higher P/E ratio than RFNDF: RSHPF (19.21) vs RFNDF (15.51). RSHPF YTD gains are higher at: 32.632 vs. RFNDF (27.850).
RFNDFRSHPFRFNDF / RSHPF
Capitalization493M604M82%
EBITDA88.7MN/A-
Gain YTD27.85032.63285%
P/E Ratio15.5119.2181%
Revenue104MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RFNDF vs RSHPF: Fundamental Ratings
RFNDF
RSHPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4348
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10087
SMR RATING
1..100
8679
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1252
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5040

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RSHPF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as RFNDF (20). This means that RSHPF’s stock grew similarly to RFNDF’s over the last 12 months.

RSHPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as RFNDF (100). This means that RSHPF’s stock grew similarly to RFNDF’s over the last 12 months.

RSHPF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as RFNDF (86). This means that RSHPF’s stock grew similarly to RFNDF’s over the last 12 months.

RFNDF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as RSHPF (44). This means that RFNDF’s stock grew similarly to RSHPF’s over the last 12 months.

RFNDF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RSHPF (52). This means that RFNDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RSHPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RFNDFRSHPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RFNDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
THGIX26.800.09
+0.34%
Thornburg International Growth R6
AUENX21.61N/A
N/A
AQR Large Cap Defensive Style N
FEIKX81.17-0.13
-0.16%
Fidelity Equity-Income K
MUHLX69.97-0.13
-0.19%
Muhlenkamp
SSCDX18.12-0.15
-0.82%
Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth I

RFNDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RFNDF and PAZRF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RFNDF and PAZRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RFNDF
1D Price
Change %
RFNDF100%
N/A
PAZRF - RFNDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
EFRTF - RFNDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYLOF - RFNDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
SEGXF - RFNDF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
PRKWF - RFNDF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RSHPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSHPF and IIPZF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSHPF and IIPZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSHPF
1D Price
Change %
RSHPF100%
N/A
IIPZF - RSHPF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LAREF - RSHPF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PPRQF - RSHPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RIOCF - RSHPF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
RFNDF - RSHPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More