Advertisement
RFNDF vs RSHPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFNDF is a Hold and RSHPF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RFNDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRSHPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- RFNDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- RSHPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RFNDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSHPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RFNDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
- RSHPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
RFNDF (@Specialty Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RSHPF (@Media Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was -1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.66%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.20%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Telecommunications (-1.50% weekly)Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.
@Media Conglomerates (-0.41% weekly)Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
| RFNDF | RSHPF | RFNDF / RSHPF | |
| Capitalization | 485M | 603M | 80% |
| EBITDA | 88.7M | 56.1M | 158% |
| Gain YTD | 27.850 | 21.053 | 132% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.18 | 17.61 | 137% |
| Revenue | 104M | 85.1M | 122% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 7.29M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 558M | - |
RFNDF | RSHPF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 97 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RSHPF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as RFNDF (18). This means that RSHPF’s stock grew similarly to RFNDF’s over the last 12 months.
RSHPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as RFNDF (100). This means that RSHPF’s stock grew similarly to RFNDF’s over the last 12 months.
RFNDF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as RSHPF (91). This means that RFNDF’s stock grew similarly to RSHPF’s over the last 12 months.
RFNDF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as RSHPF (55). This means that RFNDF’s stock grew similarly to RSHPF’s over the last 12 months.
RFNDF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RSHPF (63). This means that RFNDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RSHPF’s over the last 12 months.
| RFNDF | RSHPF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 25% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 30% | 4 days ago 33% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 30% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 44% | 4 days ago 25% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 34% | 4 days ago 28% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 24% | 4 days ago 31% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 14 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 16% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BBGSX | 17.28 | 0.12 | +0.70% |
| Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth | |||
| TGCEX | 33.57 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| TCW Concentrated Large Cap Growth I Cl | |||
| LAVRX | 16.20 | -0.04 | -0.25% |
| Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R3 | |||
| MYIEX | 7.86 | -0.93 | -10.57% |
| MassMutual International Eq Svc | |||
| MDVSX | 8.04 | -2.46 | -23.41% |
| MassMutual Diversified Value R5 | |||
RFNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RFNDF and PAZRF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RFNDF and PAZRF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RFNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFNDF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PAZRF - RFNDF | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.89% | ||
| EFRTF - RFNDF | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.71% | ||
| BYLOF - RFNDF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.88% | ||
| SEGXF - RFNDF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PRKWF - RFNDF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
RSHPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RSHPF and IIPZF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSHPF and IIPZF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RSHPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSHPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| IIPZF - RSHPF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
| LAREF - RSHPF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PPRQF - RSHPF | 3% Poorly correlated | +6.75% | ||
| RIOCF - RSHPF | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.97% | ||
| RFNDF - RSHPF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||