Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFNCX vs VTSMX
RFNCX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts RFNCX vs VTSMX
American Funds Fundamental Invs R3
Price$90.79
Change+$0.50 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.2B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$155.50
Change-$0.31 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95T
RFNCX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFNCX vs. VTSMX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFNCX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.95T vs. RFNCX (156B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than RFNCX: VTSMX (1.07) vs RFNCX (0.65). RFNCX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: RFNCX (23 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). RFNCX (0.92) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). RFNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). RFNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: RFNCX (250) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.03 vs. RFNCX (13.12). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 84.94 vs. RFNCX (50.59).
| RFNCX | VTSMX | RFNCX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.14 | 657% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.14 | 657% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.144 | 10.330 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 3000 | 8% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 1.95T | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.07 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.12 | 18.03 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.15 | 63.63 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.59 | 84.94 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.33 | 224.15 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement