Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFJTX vs TBLCX
RFJTX vs TBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFJTX has more cash in the bank: 4.78B vs. TBLCX (129M). RFJTX pays higher dividends than TBLCX: RFJTX (3.08) vs TBLCX (2.92). RFJTX was incepted earlier than TBLCX: RFJTX (16 years) vs TBLCX (4 years). RFJTX (0.30) is less costly to investors than TBLCX (0.20). TBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.10 vs. RFJTX (6.00). RFJTX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBLCX: RFJTX (250) vs TBLCX (500000). TBLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.03 vs. RFJTX (7.45).
| RFJTX | TBLCX | RFJTX / TBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.20 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.20 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.551 | 4.201 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.78B | 129M | 3,702% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.08 | 2.92 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.45 | 8.03 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.63 | 29.62 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.45 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.37 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement