Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFISX vs WCMNX
RFISX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts RFISX vs WCMNX
Ranger Small Cap Institutional
Price$16.22
Change-$1.37 (-7.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.98M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$14.42
Change+$0.82 (+6.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
RFISX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFISX vs. WCMNX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFISX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMNX has more cash in the bank: 47.1M vs. RFISX (22M). RFISX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . RFISX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: RFISX (14 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than RFISX (1.57). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RFISX (35.55). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFISX: WCMNX (1000) vs RFISX (250000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.34 vs. RFISX (-13.54). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -6.49 vs. RFISX (-28.10).
| RFISX | WCMNX | RFISX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.24 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 2.04 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.757 | 6.421 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000 | 25,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22M | 47.1M | 47% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.54 | 8.34 | -162% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.37 | 18.68 | -29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.10 | -6.49 | 433% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement