Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFISX vs WCMNX
RFISX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts RFISX vs WCMNX
Ranger Small Cap Institutional
Price$18.06
Change-$0.04 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.14M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.84
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.65M
RFISX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFISX vs. WCMNX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFISX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMNX has more cash in the bank: 44.7M vs. RFISX (23.1M). RFISX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . RFISX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: RFISX (14 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than RFISX (1.57). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RFISX (35.55). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFISX: WCMNX (1000) vs RFISX (250000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.04 vs. RFISX (-2.43). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -5.40 vs. RFISX (-21.38).
| RFISX | WCMNX | RFISX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.24 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 2.04 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.551 | 9.062 | -6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000 | 25,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.1M | 44.7M | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.43 | 7.04 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.99 | 32.95 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.38 | -5.40 | 396% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.52 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement