Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFISX vs WCMLX
RFISX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts RFISX vs WCMLX
Ranger Small Cap Institutional
Price$18.10
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.19M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.08
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.65M
RFISX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFISX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFISX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMLX has more cash in the bank: 44.7M vs. RFISX (23.2M). RFISX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . RFISX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: RFISX (14 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RFISX (1.57). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RFISX (35.55). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFISX: WCMLX (100000) vs RFISX (250000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.14 vs. RFISX (-1.79). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -4.02 vs. RFISX (-21.20).
| RFISX | WCMLX | RFISX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.99 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.79 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.330 | 9.487 | -3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 100000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.2M | 44.7M | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.79 | 8.14 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.58 | 33.08 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.20 | -4.02 | 527% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.10 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement