Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFISX vs WCMLX
RFISX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts RFISX vs WCMLX
Ranger Small Cap Institutional
Price$16.22
Change-$1.37 (-7.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.98M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.64
Change+$0.83 (+6.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
RFISX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFISX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFISX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMLX has more cash in the bank: 47.1M vs. RFISX (22M). RFISX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . RFISX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: RFISX (14 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RFISX (1.57). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RFISX (35.55). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFISX: WCMLX (100000) vs RFISX (250000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. RFISX (-13.54). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.30 vs. RFISX (-28.10).
| RFISX | WCMLX | RFISX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.99 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.79 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.757 | 6.395 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 100000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22M | 47.1M | 47% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.54 | 8.52 | -159% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.37 | 19.51 | -28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.10 | -5.30 | 530% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement