Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFIMX vs WCMLX
RFIMX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts RFIMX vs WCMLX
Ranger Micro Cap Institutional
Price$7.53
Change+$0.15 (+2.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.14M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.06
Change+$0.20 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
RFIMX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFIMX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFIMX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMLX has more cash in the bank: 44.4M vs. RFIMX (11.1M). RFIMX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . RFIMX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: RFIMX (8 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). RFIMX (2.20) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RFIMX (36.75). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFIMX: WCMLX (100000) vs RFIMX (250000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.86 vs. RFIMX (-2.21). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.74 vs. RFIMX (-48.35).
| RFIMX | WCMLX | RFIMX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.99 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 1.79 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.719 | 9.331 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 100000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1M | 44.4M | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.21 | 0.86 | -256% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.74 | 23.77 | -87% |
| Returns for 5 years | -48.35 | 1.74 | -2,784% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement