Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFIMX vs WCMLX
RFIMX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts RFIMX vs WCMLX
Ranger Micro Cap Institutional
Price$7.80
Change+$0.46 (+6.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.18M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.64
Change+$0.83 (+6.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
RFIMX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFIMX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFIMX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMLX has more cash in the bank: 47.1M vs. RFIMX (11.2M). RFIMX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . RFIMX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: RFIMX (8 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). RFIMX (1.99) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RFIMX (36.75). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFIMX: WCMLX (100000) vs RFIMX (250000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. RFIMX (5.55). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.30 vs. RFIMX (-56.50).
| RFIMX | WCMLX | RFIMX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.99 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 1.79 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.703 | 6.395 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 100000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2M | 47.1M | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.55 | 8.52 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.71 | 19.51 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -56.50 | -5.30 | 1,065% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement