Intraday BUY SELL Signals
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFEM vs UMC
RFEM vs UMC Comparison
Open Charts RFEM vs UMC
First Trust RiverFront Dyn Em Mkts ETF
Price$84.91
Change-$0.74 (-0.86%)
Volume$2.83K
Net Assets59.94M
United Microelectronic
Price$9.94
Change+$0.09 (+0.91%)
Volume$300.28K
Capitalization24.21B
RFEM vs UMC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFEM vs. UMC commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFEM is a Hold and UMC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UMC: Fundamental Ratings
UMC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RFEM | UMC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 79% | 9 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
RFEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RFEM has been loosely correlated with SID. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RFEM jumps, then SID could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RFEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFEM | 100% | -0.01% | ||
| SID - RFEM | 61% Loosely correlated | +5.79% | ||
| UMC - RFEM | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| BABA - RFEM | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.81% | ||
| JD - RFEM | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| ITUB - RFEM | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.11% | ||
More | ||||
UMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMC has been loosely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UMC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMC | 100% | -1.89% | ||
| LRCX - UMC | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| KLAC - UMC | 57% Loosely correlated | -3.89% | ||
| TOELY - UMC | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| AMAT - UMC | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.96% | ||
| GFS - UMC | 51% Loosely correlated | -3.53% | ||
More | ||||