Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFATX vs VBMFX
RFATX vs VBMFX Comparison
Open Charts RFATX vs VBMFX
Russell Inv Investment Grade Bond S
Price$18.26
Change-$0.05 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index I
Price$9.62
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets359.82B
RFATX vs VBMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFATX vs. VBMFX commentary
Jul 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFATX is a Hold and VBMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VBMFX has more cash in the bank: 360B vs. RFATX (1.01B). RFATX pays higher dividends than VBMFX: RFATX (4.66) vs VBMFX (3.67). RFATX was incepted earlier than VBMFX: RFATX (18 years) vs VBMFX (39 years). RFATX (0.56) is less costly to investors than VBMFX (0.15). RFATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. VBMFX (36.00). RFATX has a lower initial minimum investment than VBMFX: RFATX (0) vs VBMFX (3000). RFATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.33 vs. VBMFX (0.10). RFATX return over 5 years is better than : -9.57 vs. VBMFX (-18.09).
| RFATX | VBMFX | RFATX / VBMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.15 | 340% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.15 | 373% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.169 | 1.477 | 282% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 360B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.66 | 3.67 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.33 | 0.10 | 4,165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.51 | -4.73 | -95% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.57 | -18.09 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.46 | -9.62 | -67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement