Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFATX vs VBMFX
RFATX vs VBMFX Comparison
Open Charts RFATX vs VBMFX
Russell Inv Investment Grade Bond S
Price$18.31
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index I
Price$9.79
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets384.63B
RFATX vs VBMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFATX vs. VBMFX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFATX is a Hold and VBMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VBMFX has more cash in the bank: 385B vs. RFATX (1.01B). RFATX pays higher dividends than VBMFX: RFATX (5.05) vs VBMFX (3.76). RFATX was incepted earlier than VBMFX: RFATX (18 years) vs VBMFX (39 years). RFATX (0.56) is less costly to investors than VBMFX (0.15). RFATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. VBMFX (36.00). RFATX has a lower initial minimum investment than VBMFX: RFATX (0) vs VBMFX (3000). RFATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.60 vs. VBMFX (3.60). RFATX return over 5 years is better than : -3.62 vs. VBMFX (-14.83).
| RFATX | VBMFX | RFATX / VBMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.15 | 340% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.15 | 373% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.384 | 0.205 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 385B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.05 | 3.76 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.60 | 3.60 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.12 | 0.51 | 2,167% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.62 | -14.83 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.93 | -7.68 | -142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers