Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RERGX vs TINFX
RERGX vs TINFX Comparison
Open Charts RERGX vs TINFX
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$59.10
Change-$0.80 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.56B
Thornburg International Growth R5
Price$25.86
Change-$0.35 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets735.6M
RERGX vs TINFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RERGX vs. TINFX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RERGX is a Buy and TINFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. TINFX (736M). RERGX pays higher dividends than TINFX: RERGX (1.37) vs TINFX (0.34). RERGX was incepted earlier than TINFX: RERGX (16 years) vs TINFX (17 years). TINFX (1.57) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). TINFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.57 vs. RERGX (30.00). TINFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERGX: TINFX (0) vs RERGX (250). RERGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.95 vs. TINFX (-6.28). RERGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.61 vs. TINFX (4.06).
| RERGX | TINFX | RERGX / TINFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.99 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 1.57 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.015 | 8.701 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 736M | 18,071% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.34 | 405% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.95 | -6.28 | -63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.91 | 27.48 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.61 | 4.06 | 507% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.65 | 32.02 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement