Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RERGX vs SCOBX
RERGX vs SCOBX Comparison
Open Charts RERGX vs SCOBX
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$61.62
Change-$0.33 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.06B
DWS International Growth S
Price$45.57
Change-$0.11 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets480.45M
RERGX vs SCOBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RERGX vs. SCOBX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RERGX is a Hold and SCOBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. SCOBX (480M). SCOBX pays higher dividends than RERGX: SCOBX (1.29) vs RERGX (0.95). RERGX was incepted earlier than SCOBX: RERGX (16 years) vs SCOBX (39 years). SCOBX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). RERGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. SCOBX (7.00). RERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCOBX: RERGX (250) vs SCOBX (2500). SCOBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.52 vs. RERGX (10.20). SCOBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.40 vs. RERGX (16.38).
| RERGX | SCOBX | RERGX / SCOBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.87 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.94 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.706 | 16.458 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 480M | 28,125% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.29 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.20 | 15.52 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.12 | 39.52 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.38 | 24.40 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.59 | 67.52 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement