Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RERGX vs SCOBX
RERGX vs SCOBX Comparison
Open Charts RERGX vs SCOBX
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$59.10
Change-$0.80 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.56B
DWS International Growth S
Price$43.87
Change-$0.75 (-1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets465.26M
RERGX vs SCOBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RERGX vs. SCOBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RERGX is a Buy and SCOBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. SCOBX (465M). RERGX (1.37) and SCOBX (1.33) have matching dividends . RERGX was incepted earlier than SCOBX: RERGX (16 years) vs SCOBX (39 years). SCOBX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). RERGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. SCOBX (7.00). RERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCOBX: RERGX (250) vs SCOBX (2500). SCOBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.15 vs. RERGX (3.95). SCOBX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. RERGX (20.61).
| RERGX | SCOBX | RERGX / SCOBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.87 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.94 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.015 | 12.113 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 465M | 28,602% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.33 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.95 | 11.15 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.91 | 38.32 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.61 | 30.17 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.65 | 59.04 | 40% |