Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RERFX vs TINFX
RERFX vs TINFX Comparison
Open Charts RERFX vs TINFX
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$59.02
Change-$0.80 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.56B
Thornburg International Growth R5
Price$25.86
Change-$0.35 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets735.6M
RERFX vs TINFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RERFX vs. TINFX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RERFX is a Buy and TINFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. TINFX (736M). RERFX pays higher dividends than TINFX: RERFX (1.32) vs TINFX (0.34). RERFX was incepted earlier than TINFX: RERFX (23 years) vs TINFX (17 years). TINFX (1.57) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). TINFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.57 vs. RERFX (30.00). TINFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERFX: TINFX (0) vs RERFX (250). RERFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.90 vs. TINFX (-6.28). RERFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.39 vs. TINFX (4.06).
| RERFX | TINFX | RERFX / TINFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.99 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 1.57 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.989 | 8.701 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 736M | 18,071% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 0.34 | 388% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.90 | -6.28 | -62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.75 | 27.48 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.39 | 4.06 | 502% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.39 | 32.02 | 73% |