Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RERCX vs TIGCX
RERCX vs TIGCX Comparison
Open Charts RERCX vs TIGCX
American Funds EUPAC R3
Price$60.44
Change+$0.35 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.22B
Thornburg International Growth C
Price$22.06
Change+$0.07 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets738.15M
RERCX vs TIGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RERCX vs. TIGCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RERCX is a Hold and TIGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. TIGCX (738M). RERCX pays higher dividends than TIGCX: RERCX (0.51) vs TIGCX (0.00). RERCX was incepted earlier than TIGCX: RERCX (23 years) vs TIGCX (19 years). TIGCX (2.37) is less costly to investors than RERCX (1.12). TIGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.57 vs. RERCX (35.00). RERCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TIGCX: RERCX (250) vs TIGCX (5000). RERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.73 vs. TIGCX (-5.36). RERCX return over 5 years is better than : 11.09 vs. TIGCX (-13.29).
| RERCX | TIGCX | RERCX / TIGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 2.37 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 2.37 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.874 | 11.133 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 738M | 18,293% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.73 | -5.36 | -144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.53 | 12.95 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.09 | -13.29 | -83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.65 | 19.57 | 152% |