Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RERBX vs TIGCX
RERBX vs TIGCX Comparison
Open Charts RERBX vs TIGCX
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$60.03
Change+$0.18 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.04B
Thornburg International Growth C
Price$21.90
Change-$0.08 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets725.07M
RERBX vs TIGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RERBX vs. TIGCX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RERBX is a Buy and TIGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. TIGCX (725M). RERBX pays higher dividends than TIGCX: RERBX (0.25) vs TIGCX (0.00). RERBX was incepted earlier than TIGCX: RERBX (23 years) vs TIGCX (19 years). TIGCX (2.37) is less costly to investors than RERBX (1.56). TIGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.57 vs. RERBX (35.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TIGCX: RERBX (250) vs TIGCX (5000). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.55 vs. TIGCX (-9.50). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : 12.09 vs. TIGCX (-14.55).
| RERBX | TIGCX | RERBX / TIGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 2.37 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 2.37 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.053 | 10.327 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 725M | 18,621% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.55 | -9.50 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.57 | 34.11 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.09 | -14.55 | -83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.25 | 31.85 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement