Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RERBX vs TIGCX
RERBX vs TIGCX Comparison
Open Charts RERBX vs TIGCX
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$56.75
Change+$0.14 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.15B
Thornburg International Growth C
Price$21.46
Change+$0.08 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets695.19M
RERBX vs TIGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RERBX vs. TIGCX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RERBX is a Buy and TIGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. TIGCX (695M). RERBX pays higher dividends than TIGCX: RERBX (0.23) vs TIGCX (0.00). RERBX was incepted earlier than TIGCX: RERBX (24 years) vs TIGCX (19 years). TIGCX (2.37) is less costly to investors than RERBX (1.56). TIGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.57 vs. RERBX (35.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TIGCX: RERBX (250) vs TIGCX (5000). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.52 vs. TIGCX (6.82). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : -11.10 vs. TIGCX (-23.82).
| RERBX | TIGCX | RERBX / TIGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 2.37 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 2.37 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.603 | 8.111 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134B | 695M | 19,281% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.52 | 6.82 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.36 | 16.88 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.10 | -23.82 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.04 | 16.06 | 187% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers