Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RERBX vs SIFZX
RERBX vs SIFZX Comparison
Open Charts RERBX vs SIFZX
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$62.96
Change+$0.48 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.09B
Saturna International Z
Price$27.69
Change+$0.13 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.43M
RERBX vs SIFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RERBX vs. SIFZX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RERBX is a Buy and SIFZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. SIFZX (81.4M). RERBX pays higher dividends than SIFZX: RERBX (0.23) vs SIFZX (0.07). RERBX was incepted earlier than SIFZX: RERBX (23 years) vs SIFZX (8 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than SIFZX (0.73). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. SIFZX (19.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SIFZX: RERBX (250) vs SIFZX (1000). SIFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.14 vs. RERBX (16.02). SIFZX return over 5 years is better than : 46.95 vs. RERBX (6.29).
| RERBX | SIFZX | RERBX / SIFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.73 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.73 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.815 | 24.819 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138B | 81.4M | 169,533% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.07 | 329% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.02 | 20.14 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.99 | 56.71 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.29 | 46.95 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.87 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement