Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RERAX vs TINFX
RERAX vs TINFX Comparison
Open Charts RERAX vs TINFX
American Funds EUPAC R1
Price$58.21
Change+$0.34 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.22B
Thornburg International Growth R5
Price$26.67
Change+$0.08 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets738.15M
RERAX vs TINFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RERAX vs. TINFX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RERAX is a Hold and TINFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. TINFX (738M). TINFX pays higher dividends than RERAX: TINFX (0.33) vs RERAX (0.24). RERAX was incepted earlier than TINFX: RERAX (23 years) vs TINFX (18 years). RERAX (1.57) and TINFX (1.57) have similar cost to investors . TINFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.57 vs. RERAX (35.00). TINFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERAX: TINFX (0) vs RERAX (250). RERAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.03 vs. TINFX (-2.61). RERAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.34 vs. TINFX (-5.25).
| RERAX | TINFX | RERAX / TINFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.99 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.57 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 12.106 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 738M | 18,293% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.33 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.03 | -2.61 | -270% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.84 | 19.32 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.34 | -5.25 | -159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.54 | 37.67 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement