Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REQCX vs RWMFX
REQCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts REQCX vs RWMFX
Russell Sustnbl Aware Eq C
Price$44.31
Change+$0.03 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.05M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.23
Change+$0.16 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
REQCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REQCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REQCX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. REQCX (164M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than REQCX: RWMFX (1.43) vs REQCX (0.26). REQCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: REQCX (17 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). REQCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). REQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). REQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: REQCX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.95 vs. REQCX (-3.19). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.81 vs. REQCX (-16.01).
| REQCX | RWMFX | REQCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.31 | 690% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 0.31 | 723% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.157 | 8.213 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164M | 205B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 1.43 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.19 | 7.95 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.06 | 34.82 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.01 | 50.81 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.49 | 83.34 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement