Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REMSX vs RNWBX
REMSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts REMSX vs RNWBX
Russell Inv Emerging Markets S
Price$20.86
Change+$0.06 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
REMSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMSX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. REMSX (1.15B). REMSX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: REMSX (1.97) vs RNWBX (0.12). REMSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: REMSX (33 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than REMSX (1.31). REMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). REMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: REMSX (0) vs RNWBX (250). REMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.77 vs. RNWBX (18.68). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.66 vs. REMSX (7.15).
| REMSX | RNWBX | REMSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.67 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.67 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.948 | 20.612 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 75.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.97 | 0.12 | 1,668% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.77 | 18.68 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.27 | 40.84 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.15 | 7.66 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.07 | 83.29 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement