Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REMSX vs RNWBX
REMSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts REMSX vs RNWBX
Russell Inv Emerging Markets S
Price$23.01
Change+$2.16 (+10.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.21B
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
REMSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMSX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. REMSX (1.21B). REMSX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: REMSX (1.80) vs RNWBX (0.45). REMSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: REMSX (33 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than REMSX (1.31). REMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). REMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: REMSX (0) vs RNWBX (250). REMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.54 vs. RNWBX (26.27). REMSX return over 5 years is better than : 9.58 vs. RNWBX (7.03).
| REMSX | RNWBX | REMSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.66 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.66 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.990 | 5.996 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.21B | 75.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 0.45 | 399% |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.54 | 26.27 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.22 | 38.81 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.58 | 7.03 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.66 | 114.19 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement