Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REMKX vs RNWBX
REMKX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts REMKX vs RNWBX
Victory Sophus Emerging Markets R
Price$20.21
Change+$0.09 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.45M
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.27
Change+$0.52 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.56B
REMKX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMKX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMKX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. REMKX (53.4M). REMKX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: REMKX (1.78) vs RNWBX (0.13). REMKX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: REMKX (24 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). REMKX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). REMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). REMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: REMKX (0) vs RNWBX (250). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.50 vs. REMKX (7.70). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 27.64 vs. REMKX (20.83).
| REMKX | RNWBX | REMKX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.67 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 1.67 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.859 | 15.935 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.4M | 70.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 0.13 | 1,389% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.70 | 10.50 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.06 | 37.23 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.83 | 27.64 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.96 | 63.65 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement