Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REMGX vs RNWBX
REMGX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts REMGX vs RNWBX
Victory Sophus Emerging Markets C
Price$15.53
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.45M
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.27
Change+$0.52 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.56B
REMGX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMGX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMGX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. REMGX (53.4M). REMGX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: REMGX (1.86) vs RNWBX (0.13). REMGX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: REMGX (25 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). REMGX (5.23) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). REMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than REMGX: RNWBX (250) vs REMGX (2500). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.50 vs. REMGX (6.56). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 27.64 vs. REMGX (16.38).
| REMGX | RNWBX | REMGX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.67 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.23 | 1.67 | 313% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.028 | 15.935 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.4M | 70.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 0.13 | 1,454% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.56 | 10.50 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.42 | 37.23 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.38 | 27.64 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.34 | 63.65 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers