Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REMCX vs RNWBX
REMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts REMCX vs RNWBX
Russell Inv Emerging Markets C
Price$18.98
Change+$0.10 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.91
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
REMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMCX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. REMCX (1.16B). REMCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: REMCX (1.33) vs RNWBX (0.12). REMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: REMCX (27 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). REMCX (2.31) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). REMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). REMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: REMCX (0) vs RNWBX (250). REMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.29 vs. RNWBX (19.18). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.90 vs. REMCX (3.55).
| REMCX | RNWBX | REMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 1.67 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.31 | 1.67 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.259 | 20.884 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.16B | 75.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 0.12 | 1,129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.29 | 19.18 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.65 | 41.02 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.55 | 7.90 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.23 | 82.81 | 59% |