Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REMCX vs RNWBX
REMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts REMCX vs RNWBX
Russell Inv Emerging Markets C
Price$20.81
Change+$2.03 (+10.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.21B
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
REMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. REMCX (1.21B). REMCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: REMCX (1.14) vs RNWBX (0.45). REMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: REMCX (27 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). REMCX (2.31) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). REMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). REMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: REMCX (0) vs RNWBX (250). REMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.16 vs. RNWBX (26.27). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.03 vs. REMCX (4.62).
| REMCX | RNWBX | REMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 1.66 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.31 | 1.66 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.873 | 5.996 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.21B | 75.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.45 | 252% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.16 | 26.27 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.64 | 38.81 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.62 | 7.03 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.97 | 114.19 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement