REDLF
Price
$0.31
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
426.26M
SAPLF
Price
$0.97
Change
-$0.01 (-1.01%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
345.68M
Interact to see
Advertisement

REDLF vs SAPLF

Header iconREDLF vs SAPLF Comparison
Open Charts REDLF vs SAPLFBanner chart's image
VAULT MINERALS
Price$0.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.69K
Capitalization426.26M
Sylvania Platinum
Price$0.97
Change-$0.01 (-1.01%)
Volume$7.05K
Capitalization345.68M
REDLF vs SAPLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
REDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAPLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
REDLF vs. SAPLF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REDLF is a Hold and SAPLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (REDLF: $0.31 vs. SAPLF: $0.98)
Brand notoriety: REDLF and SAPLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: REDLF: 15% vs. SAPLF: 30%
Market capitalization -- REDLF: $426.26M vs. SAPLF: $345.68M
REDLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $426.26M. SAPLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $345.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

REDLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAPLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • REDLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SAPLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAPLF is a better buy in the long-term than REDLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

REDLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAPLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • REDLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SAPLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, REDLF is a better buy in the short-term than SAPLF.

Price Growth

REDLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.21% price change this week, while SAPLF (@Precious Metals) price change was +9.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REDLF($426M) has a higher market cap than SAPLF($346M). REDLF has higher P/E ratio than SAPLF: REDLF (26.18) vs SAPLF (6.47). SAPLF YTD gains are higher at: 80.556 vs. REDLF (61.343). SAPLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 84.5M vs. REDLF (-2.8M). REDLF has more cash in the bank: 116M vs. SAPLF (94.1M). SAPLF has less debt than REDLF: SAPLF (84K) vs REDLF (23M). REDLF has higher revenues than SAPLF: REDLF (245M) vs SAPLF (152M).
REDLFSAPLFREDLF / SAPLF
Capitalization426M346M123%
EBITDA-2.8M84.5M-3%
Gain YTD61.34380.55676%
P/E Ratio26.186.47404%
Revenue245M152M161%
Total Cash116M94.1M123%
Total Debt23M84K27,381%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAPLF: Fundamental Ratings
SAPLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80
SMR RATING
1..100
81
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
REDLFSAPLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
REDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAPLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STESX15.710.12
+0.77%
Bernstein International Strat Eqs SCB
LCIAX206.091.05
+0.51%
SEI Large Cap Index A (SIIT)
SGICX16.680.08
+0.48%
SGI US Large Cap Equity C
VCIGX12.680.05
+0.40%
VALIC Company I Dividend Value
VLSCX16.53N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Long/Short Equity C

REDLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that REDLF and STRFF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that REDLF and STRFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To REDLF
1D Price
Change %
REDLF100%
N/A
STRFF - REDLF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
SAPLF - REDLF
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
SLSR - REDLF
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
HAMRF - REDLF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VINS - REDLF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SAPLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SAPLF and ELKMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SAPLF and ELKMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAPLF
1D Price
Change %
SAPLF100%
-1.52%
ELKMF - SAPLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAPTF - SAPLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-9.91%
STPGF - SAPLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
FFOXF - SAPLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.53%
REDLF - SAPLF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More