Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RECS vs XVOL
RECS vs XVOL Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs XVOL
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$36.82
Change+$0.16 (+0.44%)
Volume$900
Net Assets3.02B
Acruence Active Hedge US Equity ETF
Price$21.82
Change+$0.21 (+0.97%)
Volume$100
Net Assets4.36M
RECS vs XVOL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. XVOL commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Hold and XVOL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.02B vs. XVOL (4.36M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than XVOL: RECS (5.893) vs XVOL (1.302). RECS was incepted earlier than XVOL: RECS (6 years) vs XVOL (4 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than XVOL (0.86). XVOL has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| RECS | XVOL | RECS / XVOL | |
| Gain YTD | 5.893 | 1.302 | 453% |
| Net Assets | 3.02B | 4.36M | 69,273% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.86 | 17% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 568.00 | 9% |
| Yield | 0.69 | 3.11 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | XVOL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been loosely correlated with CR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then CR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| CR - RECS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.85% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| EXP - RECS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| INTU - RECS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
More | ||||
XVOL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that XVOL and DASH have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XVOL and DASH's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XVOL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XVOL | 100% | N/A | ||
| DASH - XVOL | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.12% | ||
| BIP - XVOL | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
| FIBK - XVOL | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.83% | ||
| AFRM - XVOL | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.73% | ||
| NET - XVOL | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.07% | ||
More | ||||