Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RECS vs XVOL
RECS vs XVOL Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs XVOL
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$41.05
Change+$0.69 (+1.71%)
Volume$712.13K
Net Assets5.07B
Acruence Active Hedge US Equity ETF
Price$23.29
Change-$0.22 (-0.94%)
Volume$1.85K
Net Assets2.33M
RECS vs XVOL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. XVOL commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Hold and XVOL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 5.07B vs. XVOL (2.33M). XVOL has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: XVOL (2.033) vs RECS (1.445). RECS was incepted earlier than XVOL: RECS (6 years) vs XVOL (5 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than XVOL (0.83). XVOL has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| RECS | XVOL | RECS / XVOL | |
| Gain YTD | 1.445 | 2.033 | 71% |
| Net Assets | 5.07B | 2.33M | 217,604% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.83 | 18% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 361.00 | 14% |
| Yield | 0.78 | 1.92 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | XVOL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 72% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.42% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.44% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
More | ||||
XVOL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that XVOL and WHR have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XVOL and WHR's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XVOL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XVOL | 100% | N/A | ||
| WHR - XVOL | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.06% | ||
| EPD - XVOL | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
| IR - XVOL | 11% Poorly correlated | +3.31% | ||
| RCL - XVOL | 11% Poorly correlated | +2.90% | ||
| UBER - XVOL | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.99% | ||
More | ||||